Ever since MIT past president L. Rafael Reif kicked off the DEI gold rush, inviting thousands of diversity-hire administrators to prospect for sinecures, a parallel extrajudicial system has mushroomed on campus ready to adjudicate every conflict of student, faculty, and staff life.

Does the climate for restorative justice experts get any better or what?

Restorative Justice is a flexible new concept bringing the rule of law into the Gen Z Age, allowing empowered bureaucrats to make things up as they go along, delivering Belonging to an infantilized community. It’s the only way to deal with children who grew up never calling their own fouls playing pick-up street basketball.

Whether it’s issues of academic integrity, claims of being misgendered, or worries that your classmates are calling for the death of your family, dozens of highly paid facilitators with undefined powers are standing by to help you and you accusers work things out.

“In restorative justice conferencing, the Responding Party is involved in face-to-face dialogue with the people who were most affected by the person’s behavior. This type of process can be effective in cases where the harmful behavior may have a wider impact on the community. The group of people may involve supporters of the Responding Party and the impacted parties.”

Think of it as a struggle session designed by Oberlin-trained DEI deans.

Story suggested by our pals at the Flickering Beacon